F. Zigante et al., Several difficulties in the first encounters with children presumed to be victims of sexual abuse, PSYCHIAT EN, 43(1), 2000, pp. 309-326
Bused on our experience concerning the reception of children presumed to be
victims of sexual abuse at the Saint Vincent de Paul hospital of Paris, ze
e wish to underline the difficulties such work has brought to light.
Should Ice limit ourselves to the role most often demanded of us as expert
on the credibility of the child's account and forget our therapeutic functi
on ? To signal or not to signal, to act or to remain silent, are these the
only possible alternatives ps or is it possible to preserve the ability to
recognize the suffering of a family at a particularly critical time
We want to insist on the potentially traumatizing consequences for the chil
d of the circuit he must follow as soon as there is suspicion sexual abuse
with its cortege of investigations centered on the reality his sexuality an
d ignorant of the existance of infantile sexuality and its fantasies. The c
hild, whatever the reality of the abuse might be, finds himself obliged to
admit, to give up his secrets which are, however, essential for the develop
ment of his thinking capacities.
We don't ask for systematic abstention bat try to find a path without passi
on or ignorance between action and listening, between discretion and saying
, and we refuse to adhere to any systematic procedure so that ce can fulfil
as well as possible the paradoxical objective of disclosing a situation an
d at the same time allowing it to be repressed, the best guarantee for the
continuing positive development of the child.