To develop a clearer understanding of the variables that contribute to rese
arch interest and involvement among rehabilitation counseling students and
faculty, the results of two studies examining research self-efficacy belief
s, research outcome expectations, and elements of research training environ
ments were compared. Differences were found in research outcome expectation
s and research self-efficacy between students and faculty. Social-cognitive
career theory is used as a framework fur explaining these differences, and
implications for the research training of rehabilitation counseling studen
ts are discussed.