Rm. Nixon et al., Mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer: Some results from the Swedish two-county trial, REV EPIDEM, 48(4), 2000, pp. 325-331
Background: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of
mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer to t
hose without. In the invited arm of a randomised trial of breast cancer scr
eening, data on family history of breast cancer were available on 29.179 wo
men aged 40-74 attending for screening. Among those women, 358 were diagnos
ed with breast cancer during the trial.
Methods: Those with and without a family history were compared with respect
to mammographic parenchymal pattern, interval cancer rates, mean sojourn t
ime and sensitivity of screening. In the 358 cancers, the effect of family
history was estimated on survival, incidence of advanced cancers and their
relationship to screen detection.
Results: A significantly higher proportion of high risk mammographic patter
ns was observed in association with family history among women aged 40-49.
Interval cancer rates were higher in women with a family history, and in ol
der women at least, mean sojourn time was shortened in women with a family
history (1.89 years compared to 2.70). Survival was better (although not si
gnificantly so) in cancers in women with a family history (relative hazard
= 0.52) independently of detection mode and was significantly poorer in int
erval cancers then screen detected cancers (relative hazard = 2.72) indepen
dently of family history. Similarly, interval cancers tended to be larger,
and worse malignancy grade in those with and without a family history of br
east cancer.
Conclusions: These results suggest that the policy often adopted of annual
screening for woman aged 40-49 with a family history of breast cancer, is a
reasonable one, and that it may also be necessary to shorten the inter-scr
eening interval to one year in women aged over 50 but with a positive famil
y history.