Use of quality-adjusted life year weights with dose-response models for public health decisions: A case study of the risks and benefits of fish consumption
Ra. Ponce et al., Use of quality-adjusted life year weights with dose-response models for public health decisions: A case study of the risks and benefits of fish consumption, RISK ANAL, 20(4), 2000, pp. 529-542
Risks associated with toxicants in food are often controlled by exposure re
duction. When exposure recommendations are developed for foods with both ha
rmful and beneficial qualities. however, they must balance the associated r
isks and benefits to maximize public health. Although quantitative methods
are commonly used to evaluate health risks, such methods have not been gene
rally applied to evaluating the health benefits associated with environment
al exposures. A quantitative method for risk-benefit analysis is presented
that allows for consideration of diverse health endpoints that differ in th
eir impact (i.e., duration and severity) using dose-response modeling weigh
ted by quality-adjusted life years saved. To demonstrate the usefulness of
this method, the risks and benefits of fish consumption are evaluated using
a single health risk and health benefit endpoint. Benefits are defined as
the decrease in myocardial infarction mortality resulting from fish consump
tion, and risks are defined as the increase in neurodevelopmental delay (i.
e., talking) resulting from prenatal methylmercury exposure. Fish consumpti
on rates are based on information from Washington State. Using the proposed
framework, the net health impact of eating fish is estimated in either a w
hole population or a population consisting of women of childbearing age and
their children. It is demonstrated that across a range of fish methylmercu
ry concentrations (0-1 ppm) and intake levels (0-25 g/day), individuals wou
ld have to weight the neurodevelopmental effects 6 times more (in the whole
population) or 250 times less (among women of child-bearing age and their
children) than the myocardial infarction benefits in order to be ambivalent
about whether or not to consume fish. These methods can be generalized to
evaluate the merits of other public health and risk management programs tha
t involve trade-offs between risks and benefits.