Cultural myths of human and physical nature: Integrated or separated?

Citation
G. Grendstad et P. Selle, Cultural myths of human and physical nature: Integrated or separated?, RISK ANAL, 20(1), 2000, pp. 27-39
Citations number
64
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
RISK ANALYSIS
ISSN journal
02724332 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
27 - 39
Database
ISI
SICI code
0272-4332(200002)20:1<27:CMOHAP>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Cultural Theory distinguishes between myths of human and physical nature as two integrated aspects of four cultural biases: hierarchy, egalitarianism, individualism, and fatalism,These biases serve as individuals' key orienta tions toward, for example, risk perception, public policy, and political pr eference. Myths of human and physical nature draw upon different intellectu al histories, and an epistemological merger between the two aspects is not unproblematic. A self-administered mail survey of organized environmentalis ts in Norway included the theory's graphical description of myths of physic al nature and verbal descriptions of myths of human nature. The respondents understood the logic of the myths of physical nature well and did not have problems in ranking them, thereby disconfirming the theory's claim that an y of the myths appear irrational from the perspective of any other. The emp irical results show that respondents gave the highest priority to the hiera rchical myth of physical nature and that they also endorsed the egalitarian myth of human nature. Although this outcome may appear irrational from a t heoretical perspective, the authors argue that (Grid/group) Cultural Theory is best served by treating the myths of physical and human nature as logic ally independent of one another.