Common errors in the use of magnetic resonance imaging for neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis

Citation
Rj. Wolintz et al., Common errors in the use of magnetic resonance imaging for neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis, SURV OPHTHA, 45(2), 2000, pp. 107-114
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
00396257 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
107 - 114
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-6257(200009/10)45:2<107:CEITUO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The optimal utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in neuro-ophthalmic d iagnosis is limited by errors in prescribing and interpreting scans. In a r eview of case material, we discovered four common prescriptive errors: I) f ailure to apply a dedicated study, 2) inappropriate use of a dedicated stud y, 3) omission of intravenous contrast, and 4) omission of specialized sequ ences. The four common interpretive errors were the following: 1) failure t o detect the lesion because of misleading clinical information, 2) rejectio n of a clinical diagnosis because an expected imaging abnormality was absen t, 3) assumption that a striking imaging abnormality accounted for the clin ical abnormality, and 4) failure to consider the lack of clinical specifici ty of imaging abnormalities. Many of these errors could be avoided by impro ved communication between clinicians and radiologists. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.