A. Manseck et al., Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?, UROL INTERN, 65(2), 2000, pp. 80-83
Background: The optimal extent of the prostate biopsy remains controversial
. There is a need to avoid detection of insignificant cancer but not to mis
s significant and curable tumors. In alternative treatments of prostate can
cer, repeated sextant biopsies are used to estimate the response. The aim o
f this study was to investigate the reliability of a repeated systematic se
xtant biopsy as the standard biopsy technique in patients with significant
tumors which are being considered for curative treatment. Methods: Systemat
ic sextant biopsy was performed in vitro in 92 radical prostatectomy specim
ens. Of these patients, 81 (88.0%) had palpable lesions. Results: Of the 92
investigated patients, 70 (76.1%) had potentially curable pT2-3pN0 prostat
e cancers. In these patients, the cancer was detected only in 72.9% of case
s by a repeated in vitro biopsy. In the pT2 tumors, there was a detection r
ate of only 66.7%. Conclusions: This study underlines the fact that a consi
derable number of significant and potentially curable tumors remain undetec
ted by the conventional sextant biopsy. A negative sextant biopsy does not
rule out significant prostate cancer. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Base
l.