Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?

Citation
A. Manseck et al., Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?, UROL INTERN, 65(2), 2000, pp. 80-83
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
ISSN journal
00421138 → ACNP
Volume
65
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
80 - 83
Database
ISI
SICI code
0042-1138(2000)65:2<80:ISSBSF>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Background: The optimal extent of the prostate biopsy remains controversial . There is a need to avoid detection of insignificant cancer but not to mis s significant and curable tumors. In alternative treatments of prostate can cer, repeated sextant biopsies are used to estimate the response. The aim o f this study was to investigate the reliability of a repeated systematic se xtant biopsy as the standard biopsy technique in patients with significant tumors which are being considered for curative treatment. Methods: Systemat ic sextant biopsy was performed in vitro in 92 radical prostatectomy specim ens. Of these patients, 81 (88.0%) had palpable lesions. Results: Of the 92 investigated patients, 70 (76.1%) had potentially curable pT2-3pN0 prostat e cancers. In these patients, the cancer was detected only in 72.9% of case s by a repeated in vitro biopsy. In the pT2 tumors, there was a detection r ate of only 66.7%. Conclusions: This study underlines the fact that a consi derable number of significant and potentially curable tumors remain undetec ted by the conventional sextant biopsy. A negative sextant biopsy does not rule out significant prostate cancer. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Base l.