P. Garcesyepez et al., EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTAL ENERGY-SOURCE AND AMOUNT ON FORAGE INTAKE ANDPERFORMANCE BY STEERS AND INTAKE AND DIET DIGESTIBILITY BY SHEEP, Journal of animal science, 75(7), 1997, pp. 1918-1925
Two levels of concentrate supplements containing different types of ca
rbohydrates (corn-soybean meal, CSBM; wheat middlings, WM; and soybean
hulls, SBH) were evaluated for effects on forage intake and performan
ce in growing steers and total diet digestibility in sheep. In Exp. 1,
63 crossbred yearling cattle (298 and 377 kg initial BW for yr 1 and
2, respectively) were given ad libitum access to chopped bermudagrass
(Cynodon: dactylon [L.]) hay with no supplementation (CONTROL) or with
25 or 50% of projected total TDN intake from CSBM, WM, br SBH. In Exp
. 2, digestibilities of organic matter (OMD) and neutral detergent fib
er (NDFD) were determined with sheep fed levels of hay and concentrate
s similar to those used in the growth trials. Hay intake was 1.99% of
BW for steers fed hay alone and averaged 1.93% of BW in steers fed sup
plements at the low level. At the high level of concentrate supplement
ation, hay intake was depressed (P < .001) to a similar extent (1.63%
of BW) in steers supplemented with CSBM, WM, or SBH. At the low concen
trate level, shrunk ADG was similar (.63 kg/d) among supplements, but
at the high concentrate level steers fed SBH had higher (P = .06) shru
nk ADG (.95 kg/d) than steers fed CSBM (.76 kg/d). Body condition scor
e (BCS) increased more (P = .06) for CSBM- and SBH- than for WM-supple
mented steers. Total tract OMD was lower (P < .001) in sheep fed WM (5
4.8% for low and 56.9% for high supplementation levels) than in sheep
fed CSBM (57.4 and 62.6%) or SBH (57.2 and 62.5%). Total tract NDFD wa
s higher (P < .001) for the SBH (58.9% for low and 63.3% for high leve
ls) diets than for CSBM (54.6 and 51.0%) or WM (54.6 and 51.8%) diets.
Supplements containing highly digestible fiber;(SBH) produced less ne
gative associative effects than high-starch supplements (CSBM) when fe
d with bermudagrass hay at the high level (.8 to 1% of BW), but no dif
ferences were found at the low feeding level (.4 to .5% of BW).