Theories of agrammatism have been challenged by the discovery that agrammat
ic patients can make above-chance judgements of grammaticality. Chinese pos
es an interesting test of this phenomenon, because its grammar is so auster
e, with few obligatory features. An on-line grammaticality judgement task w
as conducted with normal and aphasic speakers of Chinese, using the small s
et of constructions that do permit judgements of grammaticality in this lan
guage. Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics showed similar patterns, with above-
chance discrimination between grammatical and ungrammatical forms, suggesti
ng once again that Broca's aphasics are not unique in the degree of sparing
or impairment that they show in receptive grammar. However, even for young
normals, false-negative rates were high. We conclude that there is some se
nsitivity to grammatical well-formedness in Chinese aphasics, but the effec
t is fragile for aphasics and probabilistic for normals, reflecting the pec
uliar status of grammaticality in this language.