Ek. Hoogeveen et al., Hyperhomocysteinemia is associated with the presence of retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus - The Hoorn Study, ARCH IN MED, 160(19), 2000, pp. 2984-2990
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness among patients wi
th type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Hyperhomocysteinemia is a recently recogn
ized risk factor for cardiovascular disease, independent of established ris
k factors.
Objective: To study the association between the homocysteine level and reti
nopathy among subjects with and without DM.
Methods: We studied an age-, sex-, and glucose tolerance-stratified random
sample of a 50- to 75-year-old general white population in the Hoorn Study
(N = 625). Retinal vascular changes (retinopathy) were assessed using ophth
almoscopy and/or fundus photography. Hyperhomocysteinemia was defined as a
serum total homocysteine level greater than 16 mu mol/L.
Results: The prevalence of retinopathy was 9.8% (28/285) in subjects with n
ormal glucose tolerance, 11.8% (20/169) in those with impaired glucose tole
rance, 9.4% (10/106) in those with newly diagnosed type 2 DM, and 32.3% (21
/65) in those with known type 2 DM. The prevalence of retinopathy was 10.3%
(39/380) in subjects without hypertension and 16.3% (40/245) in subjects w
ith hypertension; it was 12.0% (64/534) in subjects with a serum total homo
cysteine level of 16 mu mol/L orless and 16.5% (15/91) in those with a seru
m total homocysteine level of more than 16 mu mol/L. After stratification f
or DM and adjustment for age, sex, glycosylated hemoglobin, and hypertensio
n, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for the relation between retino
pathy and hyperhomocysteinemia was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-2.82
) in patients without DM and 3.44 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-10.42) in
patients with DM (P=.08 for interaction).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that hyperhomocysteinemia may be a risk fa
ctor for retinopathy in patients with type 2 DM, but probably not in patien
ts without DM.