Background: Any sentinel lymph node that receives lymph drainage directly f
rom a primary melanoma site, regardless of its location, may contain metast
atic disease. This is true even if the sentinel node does not lie in a reco
gnized node field. Interval (in-transit) nodes that lie along the course of
a lymphatic vessel between a primary melanoma site and a recognized node f
ield are sometimes seen during lymphatic mapping for sentinel node biopsy.
If drainage to such interval nodes is ignored by the surgeon during sentine
l node biopsy, metastatic melanoma will be missed in some patients.
Hypothesis: When lymph drains directly from a cutaneous melanoma site to an
interval node, that sentinel node has the same chance of harboring microme
tastatic disease as a sentinel node in a recognized node field.
Design: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with technetium Tc 99m antimony tri
sulfide colloid was performed to define lymphatic drainage patterns and, si
nce 1992, to locate the sentinel lymph nodes for surgical biopsy or for per
manent skin marking of their location with point tattoos.
Setting: Melanoma unit of a university teaching hospital.
Patients: A total of 2045 patients with cutaneous melanoma were studied in
13 years.
Results: Interval nodes were found in 148 patients (7.2%). The incidence of
interval nodes varied with the sire of the primary melanoma. Interval node
s were more common with melanomas on the trunk than with those on the lower
limbs. Micrometastatic disease was found in 14% of interval nodes that und
erwent biopsy as sentinel nodes. This incidence is similar to that found in
sentinel nodes located in recognized node fields, confirming the potential
clinical importance of interval nodes.
Conclusions: Interval nodes should be removed surgically along with any add
itional sentinel nodes in standard node fields if the sentinel node biopsy
procedure is to be complete. In some patients, an interval node will be the
only lymph node that contains metastatic disease.