S. Rosenman et al., Characterising psychosis in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing Study on Low Prevalence (psychotic) Disorders, AUST NZ J P, 34(5), 2000, pp. 792-800
Objective: This study examines the factorial structure of symptoms and sign
s in psychosis in data from the Study on Low Prevalence (psychotic) Disorde
rs which is part of the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Aus
tralia 1997-1998.
Method: The present study examined a wide variety of symptoms taken from th
e Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry items and the substa
nce use items in the Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis, an instrument spec
ially constructed for the national study. The instrument was applied to 980
community and hospital subjects with a wide range of psychotic illness dia
gnoses. The data were factor analysed and scales of 'domains of psychopatho
logy' derived.
Results: The data were best fitted by five principal factors ('domains') wh
ich can be approximately labelled dysphoria, positive symptoms, substance u
se, mania and negative symptoms/incoherence. These factors together explain
ed 55.4% of variance in symptoms. Solutions with more numerous factors did
not improve the representation.
Conclusion: The five domains successfully characterise a large part of the
variance in psychopathology found in the present study of low prevalence (p
sychotic) disorders. The approach allows sufferer's symptom range and sever
ity to be well expressed without multiple comorbid diagnoses or the limits
imposed by categorical diagnosis. Knowledge of alternative dimensional repr
esentations of psychopathology may usefully complement our use of categorie
s, enhance awareness of symptoms and ensure that important psychopathology
is heeded in practice and research.