A. Ahuja et M. Ying, Grey-scale sonography in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: review ofsonographic appearances and features that may help a beginner, BR J ORAL M, 38(5), 2000, pp. 451-459
Ultrasound examinations of the neck in 218 patients with confirmed cervical
lymphadenopathy were reviewed. Lymph nodes were assessed for their size, s
hape, internal architecture, echogenicity, nodal border, posterior enhancem
ent, and ancillary features (adjacent soft tissues oedema, and matting). Th
e hilus is a linear, echogenic, non-shadowing structure containing nodal ve
ssels, and is continuous with fat around the node. Coagulation necrosis is
an ill-defined, rounded, non-shadowing echogenic area within a node. It is
less echogenic than the hilus and is not continuous with the fat around the
node. Calcification is a highly echogenic focus within the node, which may
be dense or punctate echogenic foci. It is not continuous with the fat aro
und the node. Dense int anodal calcification usually produces shadowing. Ho
wever, fine punctate calcification may not have posterior shadowing though,
if the transducer frequency is increased, it may show thin lines. Cystic n
ecrosis is focal, often ill-defined echolucent area within the node. Echoge
nicity of lymph nodes is usually compared with the adjacent muscles, and is
classified as hypoechogenicity, isoechogenicity, and hyperechogenicity. Th
e nodal border is assessed for its sharpness. Posterior enhancement is when
the structures posterior to the node look more echogenic than neighbouring
areas. Oedema of soft tissues is an ill-defined, hypoechoic area around th
e node with loss of adjacent fascial planes. Nodes are considered matted wh
en they are clumped or adherent to each other with no normal intervening so
ft tissue between them. Ultrasound features that help only in identifying a
bnormal nodes include size, shape, echogenic hilus, hypoechogenicity or iso
echogenicity, echogeneity, coagulation necrosis, and a sharp nodal border.
Ultrasound features that help to identify abnormal nodes as well as giving
clues to the primary lesion include hyperechogenicity, intranodal calcifica
tion, intranodal cystic necrosis, ragged nodal border, posterior enhancemen
t, adjacent soft tissue oedema, and matting. (C) 2000 The British Associati
on of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.