Small nations fear that FTAs with larger, richer nations will erode their i
ndustrial bases. These concerns are recognized in FTA and multilateral talk
s: small nations may explicitly or implicitly maintain higher trade barrier
s. Using a model where symmetric liberalization de-industrializes small, po
or nations, we characterize the path of protection-asymmetries that allow l
iberalization without delocation. In welfare terms, the large nation prefer
s this no-delocation liberalization scheme only when barriers are sufficien
tly high; the small nation's ranking is reversed. An anti-delocation scheme
involving international income transfers is also evaluated and found infea
sible.