A phase I radioimmunotherapy trial evaluating (90)yttrium-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) chimeric T84,66 in patients with metastatic CEA-producing malignancies
Jyc. Wong et al., A phase I radioimmunotherapy trial evaluating (90)yttrium-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) chimeric T84,66 in patients with metastatic CEA-producing malignancies, CLIN CANC R, 6(10), 2000, pp. 3855-3863
Chimeric T84.66 (cT84.66) is a genetically engineered human/murine chimeric
IgG(1) with high affinity and specificity to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA
), The purpose of this Phase I dose escalation therapy trial was to evaluat
e the toxicities, biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, tumor targeting, immun
ogenicity, and organ and tumor absorbed dose estimates of cT84.66 labeled w
ith Y-90, Patients with metastatic CEA-producing malignancies were first ad
ministered 5 mCi In-111-labeled DTPA-cT84.66 (5 mg), followed by administra
tion of the therapy dose of Y-90-labeled DTPA-cT84.66 1 week later, The the
rapy infusion was immediately followed by a 72-h administration of DTPA at
250 mg/m(2)/24 h, Dose levels of administered activity ranged from 5 to 22
mCi/m(2) with three to six patients per level. Serial nuclear scans, blood
samples, and 24-h urine collections were performed out to 5 days after infu
sion. Human antichimeric antibody response was assayed out to 6 months, Pat
ients were administered up to 3 cycles of therapy every 6 weeks. Radiation
absorbed doses to organs were estimated using a five compartment model and
MIRDOSE3, Twenty-two patients received at least one cycle of therapy, with
one individual receiving two cycles and two receiving three cycles of thera
py, All mere heavily pretreated and had progressive disease prior to entry
in this trial. Reversible leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were the primary
dose-limiting toxicities observed. Maximum tolerated dose was reached at 22
mCi/m(2). In general, patients with liver metastases demonstrated more rap
id blood clearance of the antibody. Thirteen patients developed an immune r
esponse to the antibody. Average radiation doses to marrow, liver, and whol
e body were 2.6, 29, and 1.9 cGy/mCi Y-90, respectively. Dose estimates to
tumor ranged from 66 to 1670 cGy (8.7 to 52.2 cGy/mCi Y-90) for each cycle
of therapy delivered. Although no major responses were observed, three pati
ents demonstrated stable disease of 12-28 weeks duration and two demonstrat
ed a mixed response. In addition, a 41-100% reduction in tumor size was obs
erved with five tumor lesions. Y-90-labeled cT84,66 was well tolerated, wit
h reversible thrombocytopenia and leukopenia being dose limiting. Patients
with extensive hepatic involvement by tumor demonstrated unfavorable biodis
tribution for therapy with rapid blood clearance and poor tumor targeting.
Average tumor doses when compared with red marrow doses indicated a favorab
le therapeutic ratio. Stable disease and mixed responses were observed in t
his heavily pretreated population with progressive disease. This trial repr
esents an important step toward further improving the therapeutic potential
of this agent through refinements in the characteristics of the antibody a
nd the treatment strategies used. Future trials will focus on the use of pe
ripheral stem cell support to allow for higher administered activities and
the use of combined modality strategies with radiation-enhancing chemothera
py drugs. Further efforts to reduce immunogenicity through humanization of
the antibody are also planned. Finally, novel engineered, lower molecular w
eight, faster clearing constructs derived from cT84,66 continue to be evalu
ated in preclinical models as potential agents for radioimmunotherapy.