OBJECTIVE Gain of function mutations of the thyrotrophin receptor (TSHR) af
fect several functional characteristics, such as cAMP and inositol phosphat
e (IP) accumulation, cell surface expression and TSH affinity. In this stud
y we compared five constitutively activating TSHR mutations, four receptors
with a point mutation (S505N, L629F, I630L, V656F) and a nine amino acid (
aa) deletion mutant (aa positions 613-621) for these functional parameters
in parallel transfection experiments.
METHODS The wild-type TSHR (wt) and TSHRs containing the mutations S505N, L
629F, I630L, V656F and the deletion 613-621 (all cloned in the expression v
ector pSVL) were transiently expressed in COS-7 cells in parallel experimen
ts. Forty-eight hours after transfection the basal and stimulated cAMP and
inositol phosphate accumulation as well as the cell surface expression (by
FACS and ELISA), K-D-values and TSHR down regulation by different stimuli w
ere determined.
RESULTS In contrast to the very different values for specific constitutive
activity (sca) (ranging from 7.5 to 100.3-fold wt) and very different level
s of receptor cell surface expression (11-94% wt level) the basal cAMP accu
mulation determined in transfected COS-7 cells was surprisingly uniform (6.
5-8.0 over wt basal). None of the point mutated receptors constitutively ac
tivates the phospholipase C cascade. In contrast the deletion 613-621 mutan
t showed constitutive activity for the IP pathway with a twofold increase i
n basal IP accumulation compared to the wild type TSHR. All investigated TS
HR-mutants showed a TSH-stimulated receptor down-regulation, which seems to
be independent of the phospholipase C pathway.
CONCLUSIONS The uniform basal cAMP values in spite of the large variation i
n specific constitutive activity values suggest that the COS-7 cell overexp
ression system used for the in vitro characterization is partly regulated.
This regulation is most likely due to receptor down regulation. The TSHR de
letion mutant (613-621) showed a constitutive activity for both the G(alpha
s) and the G(alpha q/11) pathways. The TSH-mediated IP-stimulation by this
mutant contrasts with its unresponsiveness to TSH for cAMP accumulation an
d therefore supports the model of different active conformations of the TSH
R.