Objective: To introduce the electroencephalogram silence-ratio (ESR) as a v
ariable derived from mathematically processed electroencephalogram for earl
y outcome prognosis in patients with severe head trauma and to comparativel
y assess sensitivity, specificity and predictive value vs. somatosensory ev
oked potentials and brainstem auditory evoked potentials.
Design: Prospective, Interventional study.
Setting: Intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Patients: A total of 32 adults with severe acute head trauma (Glasgow Coma
Scale score less than or equal to 8).
Methods and Main Results: In all patients, electroencephalographic recordin
g was continuously performed by frontomastoid electrode montage for 24-96 h
rs after admission to the ICU. The data were subsequently computed by fast
Fourier analysis and the ESR (intervals of suppression as periods >240 msec
s during which the electroencephalographic voltage did not exceed 5 mu V) w
as displayed and recorded an a computer for further evaluation. Somatosenso
ry evoked potentials and brainstem auditory evoked potentials were elicited
during the first 2 days after admission. Outcome evaluation was performed
6 months after trauma using the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Rappaport Dis
ability Rating Scale. After careful artifact exclusion, the ESR depicted th
e highest sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared
with evoked potentials. Even a highly significant correlation between outco
me and ESR was found (p < .0001).
Conclusion: The ESR is a valuable variable showing a high reliability with
respect to outcome prediction in severe head trauma with a higher predictiv
e value than short latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Evidence exists
that the ESR provides at least partial information regarding adequate cere
bral oxygen delivery.