Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have become the dominant the
rapeutic modality for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia
s. ICDs are implanted using techniques similar to standard pacemaker implan
tation. They not only provide high-energy shocks for ventricular fibrillati
on and rapid ventricular tachycardia, but also provide antitachycardia paci
ng for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and antibradycardia pacing. Devi
ces incorporating an atrial lead allow dual-chamber pacing and better discr
imination between ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Intens
ivists are increasingly likely to encounter patients with ICDs. Electrosurg
ery can be safely performed in ICD patients as long as the device is deacti
vated before the procedure and reactivated and reassessed immediately after
ward. Prompt and skilled intervention can prove to be life-saving in patien
ts presenting with ICD-related emergencies, including lack of response to v
entricular tachyarrhythmias, pacing failure, and multiple shocks. Recogniti
on and treatment of tachyarrhythmia can be temporarily disabled by placing
a magnet on top of an ICD. The presence of an ICD should not deter standard
resuscitation techniques. Multiple ICD discharges in a short period of tim
e constitute a serious situation. Causes include ventricular electrical sto
rm, inefficient defibrillation, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and i
nappropriate shocks caused by supraventricular tachyarrhythmias or oversens
ing of signals. ICD system infection requires hardware removal and intraven
ous antibiotic therapy. Deactivation of an ICD with the consent of the pati
ent or relatives is reasonable and ethical in terminally ill patients.