Determining the relationship between an exposure and the resulting target t
issue dose is a critical issue encountered in quantitative risk assessment
(QRA). Classical or physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) models can b
e useful in performing that task. Interest in using these models to improve
extrapolations between species, routes, and exposure levels in ORA has the
refore grown considerably in recent years. In parallel, PBTK models have be
come increasingly sophisticated. However, development of a strong statistic
al foundation to support PBTK model calibration and use has received little
attention. There is a critical need for methods that address the uncertain
ties inherent in toxicokinetic data and the variability in the human popula
tions for which risk predictions are made and to take advantage of a priori
information on parameters during the calibration process. Natural solution
s to these problems can be found in a Bayesian statistical framework with t
he help of computational techniques such as Markov chain Monte Carlo method
s. Within such a framework, we have developed an approach to toxicokinetic
modeling that can be applied to heterogeneous human or animal populations.
This approach also expands the possibilities for uncertainty analysis. We p
resent a review of these efforts and other developments in these areas. App
ropriate statistical treatment of uncertainty and variability within the mo
deling process will increase confidence in model results and ultimately con
tribute to an improved scientific basis for the estimation of occupational
and environmental health risks.