Rm. Grocott-mason et al., Long-term results after aortic valve replacement in patients with congestive heart failure - Homografts vs prosthetic valves, EUR HEART J, 21(20), 2000, pp. 1698-1707
Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the influence of valve subst
itute (homograft vs prosthetic valve) on the long-term survival and late va
lve-related complication rates following aortic valve replacement in patien
ts with aortic valve disease and congestive heart failure.
Background The effect of choice of valve substitute on outcome after aortic
valve replacement in patients with pre-operative heart failure is unknown.
The superior haemodynamic profile of homografts may be of particular benef
it.
Methods We retrospectively analysed pre-operative, operative and follow-up
data on 518 adults in functional classes III and IV, who, over the 25 years
1969-1993, had their initial aortic valve replacement at Harefield hospita
l. Follow-up conducted during 1996 to April 1997 and totalling 4439 patient
-years was 96.1% complete. Using multivariate analysis, independent risk fa
ctors for different complications and mortality were defined.
Results Overall 5-, 10- and 20-year survival was 80 +/- 2%, 62+/-2% and 30/-3%, respectively, with no significant difference between valve types. How
ever, homografts (n=381) independently reduced the rate of serious complica
tions and cardiac death, whereas mechanical valves were an independent adve
rse risk factor for late mortality. The rates of anticoagulant-related blee
ding and thromboembolism were increased by mechanical valves, whereas prima
ry tissue failure was the main complication of homografts.
Conclusions Long-term outcome of homograft aortic valve replacement in pati
ents with congestive heart failure is acceptable, with a reduced rate of se
rious complications and cardiac death. Further improvements would be expect
ed if the rate of primary tissue failure could be reduced. (C) 2000 The Eur
opean Society of Cardiology.