Clinical trial evaluating a new hub device designed to prevent catheter-related sepsis

Citation
J. Luna et al., Clinical trial evaluating a new hub device designed to prevent catheter-related sepsis, EUR J CL M, 19(9), 2000, pp. 655-662
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES
ISSN journal
09349723 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
655 - 662
Database
ISI
SICI code
0934-9723(200009)19:9<655:CTEANH>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
A new commercial hub device designed to minimise catheter-related infection s was evaluated in a prospective, randomised trial in the intensive care an d surgical units of the Hospital de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta in patients i n whom the central venous catheters were expected to remain indwelling for at least 7 days. The assessments conducted at catheter withdrawal included cultures of the skin at the catheter site and cultures of the catheter tip and the catheter hubs; moreover, in cases of suspected catheter-related sep sis, samples of peripheral blood and infusion solutions were also cultured. Of the 130 catheters evaluated, 26 (20%) were withdrawn because of suspect ed catheter-related sepsis 10 (15%) were in the control group and 16 (24%) in the new product group. Catheter-related sepsis was diagnosed in nine pat ients, six of whom were in the new product group and three in the control g roup; all infections in the former group and only one in the latter group w ere caused by the catheter connection. The rates of catheter hub colonisati on (10 cfu) and catheter colonisation (15 cfu in semiquantitative culture a nd/or >1000 cfu in quantitative culture) of hub origin were not significant ly different between the groups (15 cases in the control group vs. 20 cases in the new product group, and 5 cases in the control group vs. 11 cases in the new product group, respectively). The data indicate that the use of th e new catheter hub device is no more effective in preventing catheter-relat ed infection than standard good clinical procedures.