Aj. Torres et al., Cefminox versus metronidazole plus gentamicin in intra-abdominal infections: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, INFECTION, 28(5), 2000, pp. 318-322
Background: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the safety and
efficacy of a new cephamycin, cefminox 2 g/12 h, to those of the usual reg
imen combining metronidazole 500 mg/8 h and gentamicin 80 mg/8 h (M+G).
Patients and Methods: 160 patients with clinically proven intra-abdominal i
nfection were prospectively included in an open parallel randomized compara
tive multicenter trial. Antibiotics were started preoperatively and discont
inued after clinical and laboratory evidence of resolution of the infection
. Serum and peritoneal fluid levels and serum bactericidal activities were
also studied.
Results: 150 patients were clinically evaluable. There was one failure in t
he cefminox group and three in the M+G group (not significant, RR:1.07, 95%
CI:1-1.15). NO differences were found in the number of wound infections, l
ength of stay or duration of antibiotic therapy. Adverse effects were repor
ted in 11 cases, all of them mild to moderate. Escherichia coli and Bactero
ides fragilis were the most frequently found microorganisms.
Conclusion: Cefminox is as effective and as safe as M+G in the treatment of
intra-abdominal infections.