Important modifications to technology assessment, diffusion, adoption, and
utilization must take place if the United States is to better employ medica
l technology and save resources so as to assure access for the uninsured an
d underinsured. The United States can learn from other health systems that
are more successful in achieving these goals. The author selects for compar
ison the health systems of France and Quebec. The discussion focuses on the
differences between the three systems in the management of medical technol
ogy on a range of policy-relevant dimensions, including health system struc
ture, attitudes about planning versus market competition, government regula
tion, the balance between decentralization and centralization, the needs of
the individual and those of the society, linkages between technology asses
sment and policy-making, and the importance of medical technology assessmen
t for medical practice. Seven specific recommendations are made for better
managing medical technology in the United States, drawing on what can be ob
served from the experiences of Quebec and France.