A. Gaggl et al., Vertical alveolar ridge distraction with prosthetic treatable distracters:A clinical investigation, INT J O M I, 15(5), 2000, pp. 701-710
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
Alveolar ridge distraction is a recent and promising technique for ridge au
gmentation. Since 1997, a new distraction system incorporating a distractio
n implant has been in use. It can be used for alveolar ridge distraction an
d is not removed from the alveolar ridge. Upon completion of the distractio
n, it remains in the alveolar process for later prosthetic treatment. Thirt
y-five patients were treated with distraction implants for the correction o
f alveolar ridge deficiency. In 10 patients with atrophy of the mandible or
maxilla, 16 patients with severe defects of the alveolar process after tra
uma, and 9 patients with localized alveolar ridge defects after single toot
h loss, alveolar ridge distraction was carried out with the aid of 62 distr
action implants. The distraction implants were loaded by, prosthetic supers
tructures 4 to 6 months after distraction. A clinical and radiologic follow
-up was carried out Periotest values were examined, and periimplant bleedin
g and probing depth were registered prior to prosthetic treatment and 3, 6
and 9 months after implant loading. In 29 patients, distraction was carried
out without complications or problems. Two distraction implants were lost
In 2 patients distraction was discontinued because of ankylosis of the dist
raction segment. In 1 patient the alveolar ridge was overcorrected, and ano
ther patient experienced a persisting hypoesthesia of the lip. For 5% of th
e implants, pathologic probing depth of more than 3 mm and sulcus bleeding
were registered prior to prosthetic treatment These observations decreased
during the next 9 months. Periotest values were normal before the start of
prosthetic treatment. There was a decrease in the Periotest values, thus an
increase in implant stability, during the following 9 months. It was concl
uded that alveolar ridge distraction using distraction implants can be a su
ccessful technique for alveolar ridge augmentation with a low rate of compl
ication. Acceptable esthetic and functional results can be achieved by this
atraumatic technique of surgery and distraction.