Does growth in the manufacturing sector of an economy spillover to agricult
ure, or do sectors share similar growth rates only when they share some com
mon exogenous stimuli? The limited number of investigations of this issue,
for cross-sections of countries, have found some evidence in favour of spil
lovers though the methodologies used cannot readily separate correlation fr
om causation. Adapting the Feder (1982) model of sectoral externalities to
a time-series context, we examine how far agricultural output in Malaysia h
as been affected by inter-sectoral spillovers. Our results suggest that exp
ansion of manufacturing output, though associated with red reduced agricult
ural output in the short-run, is associated with agricultural expansion ove
r the long-run. Sec-vice output growth on the other hand seems to have been
inimical to agricultural growth in both the short- and long runs, while ca
usality testing supports the case for spillovers rather than "common causes
': Evidence on sectoral productivity is consistent with neoclassical argume
nts suggesting that the benefits of higher productivity in manufacturing te
nd to skill over to agriculture, encouraging productivity convergence.