1. This paper examines the circumstances under which control programmes may
reduce the range of two widespread invasive weeds of riparian habitats: Im
patiens glandulifera (Himalayan balsam) and Heracleum mantegazzianum (giant
hogweed).
2. The spread of both species was modelled using MIGRATE, a spatially expli
cit model that incorporates realistic demographic parameters and multiple d
ispersal mechanisms. Simulations of a range of control scenarios were run w
ithin a geographical information system (GIS) using authentic landscapes ba
sed on topographic, hydrological and land cover maps of County Durham, UK.
Results were interpreted at both a catchment and a regional scale.
3. Six representative strategies were explored that prioritized control as
follows: at random, in relation to human population density, or by the size
, age (new and old) or spatial distribution of weed populations. These stra
tegies were assessed at different intensities of management (area treated p
er year) and for varying efficiencies (proportion of plants destroyed) as w
ell as the timeliness (how long since the species became established) of im
plementations.
4. Strategies that prioritized control based on weed population and spatial
characteristics were most effective, with plant population size and spatia
l distribution being the key parameters. The reduction in geographical rang
e within a catchment or region following control was always greater for H.
mantegazzianum than I. glandulifera due to its slower rate of spread.
5. Successful control of both species at a regional scale is only possible
for strategies based on species distribution data, undertaken at relatively
high intensities and efficiencies. The importance of understanding the spa
tial structure of the population and potential habitat available, as well a
s being able to monitor the progress of the eradication programme, is highl
ighted. Tentative conclusions an offered as to the feasibility of eradicati
ng these species at a regional scale.