Sj. Fasouliotis et al., Evaluation and treatment of low responders in assisted reproductive technology: A challenge to meet, J AS REPROD, 17(7), 2000, pp. 357-373
Purpose: To investigate the various methods of evaluation and treatment of
patients with a low response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assi
sted reproductive technologies (ART).
Methods: Review and analysis of relevant studies published in the last deca
de, identified through the literature and Medline searches.
Results: While a universally accepted definition for low responders is stil
l lacking, these patients are reported to represent about 10% of the ART po
pulation. Several ovarian reserve screening techniques have been proposed;
however currently the best-characterized and most sensitive screening tools
available are the basal day 3 serum follicle-stimulating hormone level and
the clomiphene citrate challenge rest. When abnormal, these tests allow ph
ysicians to counsel patients that their prognosis for conception is pool: A
lthough the presence of a normal result does indicate better long-term chan
ces for conception, an age-related decline in fecundity remains and patient
age should still be considered when counseling patients with normal screen
ing results. Several stimulation protocols have been applied in the low-res
ponse group with varying success. Recent studies show that the use of a min
idose gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist protocol may result in signifi
cantly decreased cycle cancellations as well as increased clinical and ongo
ing pregnancies and thus is proposed as a first-line therapy Studies evalua
ting supplementary forms of treatment to the ovulation induction regimen sh
ow improved outcome when pretreating with oral contraceptives. whereas ther
e seems to be no benefit from cotreatment with growth hormone or glucocorti
coids. Blastocyst culture and transfer and assisted hatching in low respond
ers are still under evaluation, whereas natural cycle in vitro fertilizatio
n may be used in cases of repeated failures as a last option before resorti
ng to oocyte donation or adoption. Future possible forms of treatment like
in vitro maturation of immature human oocytes, cytoplasm, and nuclear trans
fer currently are experimental in nature and their efficacy has still to be
proven.
Conclusions: The evaluation and treatment of low responders in ART remains
a challenge. Understanding of the underlying etiology and pathophysiology o
f this disorder may help the clinician to approach it successfully.