Jc. Bevan et al., MIDAZOLAM PREMEDICATION DELAYS RECOVERY AFTER PROPOFOL WITHOUT MODIFYING INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENTS, Anesthesia and analgesia, 85(1), 1997, pp. 50-54
Midazolam has GABAergic effects in children that may modify propofol-i
nduced involuntary movements, yet delay recovery. In a double-blind, r
andomized study, 24 children (2-7 yr of age, ASA physical status I or
II) undergoing short surgical procedures received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg
(Group M) or placebo (Group P) per os 20-30 min before propofol anesth
esia (5 mg/kg intravenously followed by an infusion). Blind observers
scored sedation and anxiety levels (scale 1-4) before premedication, a
t separation from parents, and at induction of anesthesia. Induction a
nd emergence were videotaped, and body movements were recorded. During
recovery, times to eye opening and maximum Steward (SS = 6) and Vanco
uver Sedative Recovery (VSRS = 22) scores were noted. Parents were que
stioned about side effects that may have occurred during the following
week. Both groups were similar in age, sex, weight, timing of premedi
cation, propofol dose, and duration of surgery. The incidence of invol
untary movements did not differ between groups but was higher at induc
tion (79%) than on emergence (25%) (P < 0.05). Anxiety and sedation sc
ores were similar in Group P and Group M,but recovery took longer afte
r midazolam, with eye opening (mean +/- so) 24 +/- 7 vs 43 +/- 18 min,
maximum SS (median and range) 27 (13-37) vs 55 (24-138) min, and maxi
mum VSRS 51 (30-100) vs 80 (50-130) min. Children returned to normal a
ctivity in 1 (0-5) day, and none exhibited neurological complications.
We conclude that an oral premedicant dose of midazolam prolongs recov
ery from anesthesia in children without affecting dystonic movements a
fter propofol.