Functional outcome of semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty

Citation
Ka. Hildebrand et al., Functional outcome of semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty, J BONE-AM V, 82A(10), 2000, pp. 1379-1386
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
ISSN journal
00219355 → ACNP
Volume
82A
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1379 - 1386
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9355(200010)82A:10<1379:FOOSTE>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background: The objective of the present study was to review the results of primary total elbow arthroplasty with use of the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis . Two hypotheses were tested: (1) the results in patients with inflammatory arthritis would be superior to those in patients with a traumatic or postt raumatic condition, and (2) the isometric extensor torque after total elbow arthroplasty would be significantly less than that of the contralateral el bow. Methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients (fifty-one elbows) had the operat ion performed by one of three surgeons between November 1, 1989, and June 3 0, 1996. Thirty-six surviving patients (thirty-nine elbows) were available for follow-up. The mean duration (and standard deviation) of follow-up was 50 +/- 11 months (range, twenty-four to ninety-seven months). The mean age at the time of the operation was 64 +/- 11 years (range, twenty-seven to ei ghty-seven years). Eighteen patients (twenty-one elbows) had inflammatory a rthritis. Eighteen patients (eighteen elbows) had an acute fracture or post tranmatic condition (posttraumatic osteoarthritis in eight, an acute fractu re of the humerus in seven, nonunion of the distal aspect of the humerus in two, and primary osteoarthritis in one). The patients were evaluated with use of questionnaires (the Mayo elbow performance index, the Short Form-36 [SF-3S], and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] Question naire); clinical examination by an orthopaedic surgeon who was not involved with the preoperative, operative, postoperative, or follow-up care; radiog raphs; and elbow strength-testing with an isokinetic dynamometer. Results: The mean score (and standard deviation) on the Mayo elbow performa nce index for the group that had inflammatory arthritis (90 +/- 11 points) was significantly higher than that for the group with a traumatic or posttr aumatic condition (78 +/- 18 points) at the time of the latest follow-up (p < 0.05). In both groups, the mean extensor torque of the involved elbow wa s significantly less than that of the contralateral elbow (p < 0.05). No si gnificant difference between the groups was found with respect to the flexi on-extension are of motion. Ten elbows (26 percent) had ulnar nerve dysfunc tion (a transient deficit in six and a permanent deficit in four); nine (23 percent), an intraoperative fracture (of the humeral diaphysis in four, of the ulnar diaphysis in four, and of the olecranon in one); three (8 percen t), a periprosthetic infection; three, a triceps disruption; and one (3 per cent), a revision because of a fracture of the ulnar component. There were no other revisions. Of the thirty-four elbows with complete radiographic fo llowup, twenty-three had no change in the bone-cement interface. Progressiv e radiolucency was noted around the ulnar prosthesis in eight elbows, aroun d the humeral prosthesis in one elbow, and around both components in two el bows. Conclusions: Patients who had a total elbow arthroplasty with use of a semi constrained Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis were generally satisfied; the mean le vel of patient satisfaction was 9.2 of a possible 10 points for those who h ad inflammatory arthritis and 8.6 points for those who had a fracture or po sttraumatic condition. The rates of complications involving the ulnar nerve , intraoperative fracture, triceps disruption, deep infection, and peripros thetic radiolucency are of concern.