Study Objective: To compare the emergence characteristics of sevoflurane wi
th halothane in pediatric patients having bilateral myringotomy and pressur
e equalization tube insertion using a highly standardized and common anesth
etic technique.
Design: Prospective randomized double-blind study.
Setting: University hospital.
Patients: 43 ASA physical status I and II healthy pediatric outpatients sch
eduled for initial ear tube placement by one surgeon.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either halothane or sevo
flurane as their sole anesthetic drug for ear tube insertion. All patients
as well as the research nurse grading emergence agitation were blinded to g
roup assignment. No premedication was administered, and all patients receiv
ed a standard dose of rectal acetaminophen for postoperative pain control.
Measurement and Main Results: The primary outcome was the percentage of pat
ients with emergence agitation, defined as thrashing behavior requiring phy
sical restraint for greater than three minutes. Time to discharge from the
postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and from the hospital were also compared. S
evoflurane patients had a greater incidence of emergence delirium: 57% vers
us 27% [95% CI (1.7%-58.1%) p = 0.047]. Time to discharge from the PACU and
the hospital were longer for patients who received sevoflurane: 62 versus
50 min [95% CI (1.4-23.6) p = 0.02] and 102 versus 79 mins [95% CI (9.6-37.
1) p = 0.003].
Conclusion: In our institution there is a trend toward greater emergence ag
itation in ear tube placement patients given sevoflurane versus halothane a
nesthesia. Further, (with our discharge criteria) patients are actually dis
charged from the PACU and the hospital faster when given halothane as a sol
e anesthetic when compared to sevoflurane. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc
.