Methodologies are presented for dating releases of light nonaqueous phase l
iquids (LNAPLs) using an inverse modeling approach with simple analytical m
odels. Models for LNAPL plume migration are presented to predict LNAPL plum
e velocity in the unsaturated and saturated zones as a function of basic so
il and fluid properties. A relative mobility factor is introduced for LNAPL
movement at the water table that depends primarily on the van Genuchten n
parameter (related to the breadth of the soil pore size distribution) and t
he magnitude of water table fluctuations. Estimated LNAPL plume velocities
compare reasonably with more rigorous numerical models, which may be used i
n cases where data availability warrant the greater effort entailed.
Two methods of estimating release timing and its uncertainty are investigat
ed. A direct estimation method is described that determines travel time for
a single observed travel distance based on estimated soil and fluid proper
ties. Release date uncertainty may be determined using the first order (FO)
or Monte Carlo (MC) methods. The second method for estimating release date
involves nonlinear parameter estimation utilizing distance vs, time measur
ements and other data.
A case study is presented for a field site where independent estimates of r
elease timing were obtained from a numerical modeling analysis. Release tim
ing estimates based on direct inversion of the analytical timing model agre
e well with the numerical analysis. Results for a second field site indicat
e that release date confidence limits estimated by the FO method, assuming
log-normally distributed travel times, are close to values determined by th
e MC method, which makes no assumption regarding the form of the travel tim
e probability distribution.
Results for a hypothetical problem indicate that LNAPL velocity and travel
time may be accurately estimated if sufficient data on travel distance vs,
time are available. Incorporating prior information on relevant soil and fl
uid properties into the objective function reduces the uncertainty in relea
se date if prior estimates are accurate. However, biased prior estimates ma
y lead to over-or underestimation of release date uncertainty. Simultaneous
estimation of soil and fluid properties and release date is possible if pr
ior information is available to condition the parameter estimates. (C) 2000
Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.