How to handle topography in practical geoid determination: three examples

Citation
Ocd. Omang et R. Forsberg, How to handle topography in practical geoid determination: three examples, J GEODESY, 74(6), 2000, pp. 458-466
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF GEODESY
ISSN journal
09497714 → ACNP
Volume
74
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
458 - 466
Database
ISI
SICI code
0949-7714(200009)74:6<458:HTHTIP>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Three different methods of handling topography in geoid determination were investigated. The first two methods employ the residual terrain model (RTM) remove-restore technique, yielding the quasi-geoid, whereas the third meth od uses the classical Helmert condensation method, yielding the geoid. All three methods were used with the geopotential model Earth Gravity Model (19 96) (EGM96) as a reference, and the results were compared to precise global positioning system (GPS) levelling networks in Scandinavia. An investigati on of the Helmert method, focusing on the different types of indirect effec ts and their effects on the geoid, was also carried out. The three differen t methods used produce almost identical results at the 5-cm level, when com pared to the GPS levelling networks. However, small systematic differences existed.