Background: The advantages of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for selected
patients have been well established. However, the applicability of laparosc
opic surgery in the whole population of patients with colorectal disease is
not well known.
Methods: A single-institution medical records review of 269 patients subjec
ted to colorectal surgery was made. Of these, 206 open colorectal procedure
s were performed, and data were reviewed retrospectively. In addition, 63 p
atients were subjected to laparoscopy, and their data were recorded prospec
tively. An analysis of the existence of factors that contraindicate laparos
copic colorectal surgery was done. These factors were of two types: absolut
e (urgent intervention, severe cardiopulmonary disease, advanced liver cirr
hosis, tumor invasion into adjacent organs, simultaneous major surgery) and
relative (midrectal tumors, tumors in the transverse colon, bulky tumors,
more than two previous infraumbilical operations, previous intestinal surge
ry, and previous peritonitis).
Results: Factors that could contraindicate the laparoscopic approach were f
ound in 118 patients (44%). The most common were urgent intervention (40%),
midrectal tumors (19%), locally advanced cancer (13%), previous intestinal
surgery (13%), and tumors >10 cm (6%). We considered 25% of the contraindi
cations to be absolute and 19% relative. Taking these exclusion criteria in
to consideration when selecting patients for laparoscopic surgery, the conv
ersion rate in our initial laparoscopic series (63 cases) was 13%.
Conclusion: The indication for laparoscopic surgery for patients with color
ectal disease is superior to 60% (absolute 56%, relative 81%). When using a
ppropriate selection criteria, the conversion rate may be maintained below
10%. Preoperative selection of patients with colorectal disease allows opti
mal use of the advantages of laparoscopic surgery.