This article considers the interaction between two types of effort in lobby
ing contests: effort that improves the contestant's own performance (standa
rd rent seeking). and effort that reduces particular rivals' performance (s
abotage). Due to a positive externality, sabotage is a "small number" pheno
menon. Sabotage may increase lobbying efforts and the dissipation rate in l
obbying contests compared to a situation in which sabotage is not feasible.