Coronary microangiopathy in type 2 diabetic patients: Relation to glycemiccontrol, sex, and microvascular angina rather than to coronary artery disease
Citation
I. Yokoyama et al., Coronary microangiopathy in type 2 diabetic patients: Relation to glycemiccontrol, sex, and microvascular angina rather than to coronary artery disease, J NUCL MED, 41(6), 2000, pp. 978-985
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
SICI code
0161-5505(200006)41:6<978:CMIT2D>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Coronary microangiopathy is a major complication in diabetics. However, the
presence of independent factors in association with coronary microangiopat
hy in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) or the
difference in coronary microangiopathy between diabetics with coronary arte
ry disease (GAD) and those with microvascular angina is unclear. Methods: N
ineteen patients with NIDDM and microvascular angina, 18 patients with NIDD
M and CAD, and 17 age-matched control subjects were studied. Myocardial seg
ments that were perfused by angiographically normal coronary arteries were
studied. The baseline myocardial blood flow (MBF) and the MBF during dipyri
damole administration were measured using PET and N-13-ammonia, after which
the myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was calculated to assess coronary microa
ngiopathy. Results: The baseline MBF was comparable among NIDDM patients wi
th microvascular angina, NIDDM patients with GAD, and control subjects. How
ever, the MBF during dipyridamole administration was significantly lower in
NIDDM patients with microvascular angina (126 +/- 42.7 mL/min/100 g) than
that in either NIDDM patients with CAD (210 +/- 70.1 mL/min/100 g; P < 0.01
) or control subjects (293 +/- 159 mL/min/100 g; P < 0.01), as was the MFR
(NIDDM with microvascular angina, 1.90 +/- 0.73; NIDDM with CAD, 2.59 +/- 0
.81 [P < 0.01]; control subjects, 3.69 +/- 1.09 [P < 0.01]). Multivariate s
tepwise regression analysis showed that, among the factors considered, glyc
emic control was independently related to the MFR (r = 0.838; P< 0.05). Con
clusion: Glycemic control appears to be essential for coronary microangiopa
thy in NIDDM.