A meta-analysis of data primarily from PET oncologic investigations using F
DG PET was performed. Its purpose was to establish statistical features of
the distributions of standardized uptake values (SUVs) as possible aids in
the diagnostic process. Methods: We obtained 1536 values of oncologic marke
rs from patient studies of 40 investigations in the literature. Statistical
parameters were tabulated for analysis. Results: A significant observation
is that, unlike skewed SUV histograms, log(10)SUV has Gaussian behavior, w
hich is not uncommon for biologic quantities. This was found for SUVs of FD
G and 2 amino acids as well as a few other cancer markers. A possible model
for explaining this is proposed. For FDG, the SD sigma of the log(10)SUVs
for an average cancer category was 0.23. Examining data within the framewor
k of the model points to physiologic factors as dominating SUV variability
rather than PET protocols. When data for a single cancer category were avai
lable from multiple institutions, averages, (SUV) over bar s, disagree beyo
nd chance expectations, Diagnostic utility suggestions include a universal
linear relationship between sensitivity and severity, defined as SUV/(SUV)
over bar, on semilogarithmic probability paper; a generic receiver-operatin
g-characteristic curve for all cancers; using [log(10)((SUV) over bar(mal)/
(SUV) over bar(norm))] divided by (sigma(mal2) + sigma(norm2))(1/2) as a si
mple diagnostic effectiveness measure; and using Gaussian log(10)SUVs to av
oid erroneous P values. Conclusion: Using the logarithms of markers, such a
s SUVs, several advantages stemming from their Gaussian nature can be achie
ved with benefits ensuing to the diagnostic process.