A. Murray et al., EVALUATION OF THE IMMULITE(R) BR-MA AND CEA ASSAYS AND COMPARISON WITH IMMUNORADIOMETRIC ASSAYS FOR CA15-3 AND CEA IN BREAST-CANCER, Anticancer research, 17(3C), 1997, pp. 1945-1949
This study was designed to evaluate the performance of a new automated
assay system, the IMMULITE (R) Automated Immunoassay Analyzer in comp
arison with more commonly used IRMA assays for measuring circulating t
umour marker levels in breast cancer-patients. The assays investigated
measure the MUC1 mucin (CA15-3 antigen) or CEA. Serum samples from br
east cancer patients with various stages of disease and from a group o
f normal individuals were analysed. Significant correlations were foun
d between tumour marker levels measured using the IMMULITE (R) BR-MA a
nd the CA15-3 assays and between levels measured using the two CEA ass
ay formats. Levels of IMMULITE (R) BR-MA and CEA correlated with stage
of disease suggesting that both are markers of tumour burden Levels i
n Stage III breast cancer patients were found to be significantly high
er than those of normals using the IMMULITE (R) system but not the IRM
A assays. This would suggest a role for the automated system in the mo
nitoring of breast cancer at an earlier stage than that at which tumou
r markers are routinely used. Elevated marker levels did not correspon
d to any particular site of metastasis however a greater proportion of
patients with multiple sites of metastasis had elevated levels compar
ed with those with secondary disease at a single site. We conclude tha
t the IMMULITE (R) Automated Immunoassay Analyzer is of value in the r
outine surveillance of tumour marker levels.