Jm. Panneton et al., Aortic fenestration for acute or chronic aortic dissection: An uncommon but effective procedure, J VASC SURG, 32(4), 2000, pp. 711-720
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background: Aortic fenestration is rarely required for patients with acute
or chronic aortic dissection. To better define its role and the indications
for its use and to evaluate its success at relieving organ or limb malperf
usion, we reviewed our experience with direct fenestration of the aorta.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of all consecutive aortic fenestrations p
erformed between January 1, 1979, and December 31, 1999, was performed. Fou
rteen patients, 12 men and two women (mean age, 59.6 years; range, 43-81),
underwent fenestration of the aorta. All patients were hypertensive and had
a history of tobacco use. By Stanford classification, there were three typ
e A and II type B patients. In the acute dissection group (n = 7), indicati
ons for surgery were malperfusion in six patients (leg ischemia, 4; renal i
schemia, 5; bowel ischemia, 3) and intra-abdominal bleeding from rupture in
two. In the chronic dissection group (n = 7), indications for surgery were
abdominal aortic aneurysm in 4 patients (infrarenal, 3; pararenal, 1), tho
racoabdominal aneurysm in 1, hypertension from coarctation of the thoracic
aorta in 1, and aortic occlusion with disabling claudication in 1.
Results: Emergency aortic fenestration was performed in seven patients (sur
gically for 6 and percutaneously for 1). Fenestration level was infrarenal
in four and pararenal in three. Concomitant abdominal aortic graft replacem
ent was performed in four patients, combined with ascending aortic replacem
ent (n = 1) and bilateral aortorenal bypasses (n = 1). In two patients, acu
te fenestration was performed for organ malperfusion after prior proximal a
ortic replacement (ascending aorta, 1; descending thoracic aorta, 1). Seven
elective aortic fenestrations were performed for chronic dissection (desce
nding thoracic aorta, 2; paravisceral aorta, 2; infrarenal aorta, 2 and par
arenal aorta, 1). Concomitant aortic replacement was performed in six patie
nts (abdominal aorta, 5; thoracoabdominal aorta, 1). Fenestration was succe
ssful at restoring now in all 10 patients with malperfusion. Operative mort
ality for emergency fenestration was 43% (3/7). The three deaths that occur
red were of patients with anuria or bowel ischemia, or both. There were no
postoperative deaths for elective fenestration. At a mean follow-up of 5.1
years, there were no recurrences of malperfusion and no false aneurysm form
ations at the fenestration site.
Conclusion: Fenestration of the aorta can effectively relieve organ or limb
ischemia. Bowel ischemia and anuria are indicators of dismal prognosis and
emergency fenestration in these patients carries a high mortality Elective
fenestration combined with aortic replacement can be performed safely in c
hronic dissection. Aortic fenestration is indicated for carefully selected
patients with malperfusion and offers durable benefits.