Background - Repeat prescribing should be limited to drugs which are to be
prescribed on a long-term basis to patients whose conditions are stable. Ea
rly studies were based on small sample sizes. The definition of repeat pres
cribing has not been consistent and interpractice variation in repeat presc
ribing has not been described.
Aims - To describe the diagnostic categories and anatomical groups associat
ed with repeat prescriptions; to describe interpractice variation associate
d with repeat prescribing and to describe the repeat to consultation ratio
for the most frequently prescribed diagnoses and drugs.
Method - Doctors from a stratified quota sample of 22 Northern Ireland prac
tices recorded their perceived diagnosis for every consultation and for eve
ry repeat prescription over a 2-week period.
Results - The diagnostic categories significantly associated with repeat pr
escriptions were digestive, cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric and m
etabolic (p < 0.0001). The anatomical drug categories significantly associa
ted with repeat prescriptions were gastrointestinal drugs, cardiovascular d
rugs, central nervous system drugs, dressings and appliances (p < 0.0001).
There was wide interpractice variation in repeat prescribing (both overall
and for individual anatomical groups) and associated diagnoses. High repeat
to consultation ratios were recorded for ranitidine, temazepam and diazepa
n.
Conclusions - Wide interpractice variation in repeat prescribing and associ
ated diagnoses revealed poor consensus among practices. Therefore, the appr
oach to the management of common conditions - whether to consult or issue a
repeat prescription - was not uniform. The implications of these findings
require further research. Commonly occurring diagnoses and drugs had unacce
ptably high repeat to consultation ratios. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd.