The conscious quality of eyewitness memory for misinformation after differe
nt retention intervals was investigated in two experiments. Participants vi
ewed computer-projected slides depicting a crime (encoding phase), read a n
arrative containing misinformation, and took a recall test about the origin
al event. Remember/know judgments were made for each response. A "remember"
judgment indicated that the participant vividly recalled seeing a detail i
n the encoding phase. A "know" judgment indicated that the participant beli
eved that a detail was presented but did not vividly remember it. Generally
, misinformation was more likely to be associated with a know judgment than
with a remember judgment after a short retention interval. This outcome su
ggests that, in many cases, misleading information is judged as having a di
fferent subjective quality than memory for actual events. However, over a r
elatively long retention interval, misinformation that simply added new inf
ormation about the event was more often judged as remembered.