Modern and historical variation in aquatic macrophyte cover of billabongs associated with catchment development

Authors
Citation
Rw. Ogden, Modern and historical variation in aquatic macrophyte cover of billabongs associated with catchment development, REGUL RIVER, 16(5), 2000, pp. 497-512
Citations number
66
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
REGULATED RIVERS-RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
08869375 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
497 - 512
Database
ISI
SICI code
0886-9375(200009/10)16:5<497:MAHVIA>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Visual estimates of macrophyte cover in Murray and Ovens River billabongs w ere unrelated to farming and regulation activities, but were positively rel ated to the ratio of Chydoridae to total Cladocera in assemblages of skelet al remains from surface sediments. This ratio (%CHYD) was thus used as a su rrogate for macrophyte cover in a palaeoecological analysis. Values of %CHY D were lower in sediments deposited after European settlement than in the p re-settlement parts of sediment cores from three relatively large deep bill abongs, and two moderately-sized billabongs, reflecting an historical contr action of the littoral zone in these billabongs. No evidence of a contracti on in the littoral macrophyte zone was found in historical records from the two smallest billabongs, although the records were of poorer quality. Visu al estimates of macrophyte cover confirmed that macrophytes were generally found in small or shallow billabongs, and that large deep billabongs were m acrophyte poor. The timing and spatial pattern of the historical decline in macrophytes implicates an early farming activity as the cause. 'Control' b illabongs, at present remote from farming centres, have evidence of histori cal farm impacts which may explain why visual estimates of macrophyte cover and farming are unrelated. Use of the floodplain by farmers may have decli ned recently, and the historical pattern of macrophyte cover suggests that a naturally stable state of algal dominance has prevented macrophytes from recolonizing large deep billabongs. Evaluations of the role of billabongs i n river-floodplain functioning and river-floodplain management strategies m ust take into account the historical impacts of farming on macrophyte cover . Methods for assessing billabong health that rely on comparisons of affect ed and non-affected sites (cf. RIVPACS; Wright, 1995) will not work in this region. Attempts to rehabilitate rivers through environmental flows will f ail unless steps are taken to remedy farm impacts. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.