Low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus oral anticoagulant therapy (acenocoumarol) in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis in the elderly: A randomized trial
F. Veiga et al., Low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus oral anticoagulant therapy (acenocoumarol) in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis in the elderly: A randomized trial, THROMB HAEM, 84(4), 2000, pp. 559-564
This study aims to establish the relative effectiveness and safety of low m
olecular weight heparin in elderly patients with venous thrombosis in order
to find an alternative to oral anticoagulant therapy with less bleeding co
mplications in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
One hundred consecutive elderly patients (>75 years old) with venographical
ly demonstrated proximal DVT were included in a randomized trial. All patie
nts were treated for ten days with adjusted doses of intravenous heparin. I
nformed consent was obtained and on the right day, patients were randomly a
llocated to receive acenocoumarol (INR 2.0-3.0) or subcutaneous enoxaparin
(4000 anti-Xa units once a day) for three months. All patients were followe
d-up clinically and venographically for a one year period. The results were
analyzed with Fisher's exact test or chi-square test as appropriate.
During the treatment and surveillance period, 6 of the 50 patients (12%) wh
o received acenocoumarol and 8 of the 50 patients (16%) who received enoxap
arin had new episodes of venous thromboembolism confirmed by objective test
ing (p = 0.6; 95% CI for the difference: -19.5 to 11.5). Hemorrhagic compli
cations occurred in six of the 50 patients (12%) who received acenocoumarol
and in one (2%) of those on enoxaparin (p = 0.1; 95% CI for the difference
: -1.8 to 21.8). Vertebral fractures developed in 2 patients (4%) in the en
oxaparin group (p = 0.5; 95% CI for the diference: -11.4 to 3.4).
These results show that fixed dose enoxaparin seems to be effective and saf
e in the long-term treatment of proximal DVT in the elderly. In comparison
with oral anticoagulants, the findings are inconclusive due to the wide con
fidence intervals for differences between outcomes, however they suggest th
at the former may have less bleeding complications with similar efficacy.