Diagnosis, classification, and treatment of scaphoid fractures

Citation
H. Krimmer et al., Diagnosis, classification, and treatment of scaphoid fractures, UNFALLCHIRU, 103(10), 2000, pp. 812-819
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
UNFALLCHIRURG
ISSN journal
01775537 → ACNP
Volume
103
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
812 - 819
Database
ISI
SICI code
0177-5537(200010)103:10<812:DCATOS>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Herbert's classification of scaphoid fractures provides the underlying rati onale for treatment according to the fracture type. A CT bone scan in the l ong axis of the scaphoid is the best means of differentiating between stabl e and unstable fractures. This is difficult from conventional X-rays due to the particular three-dimensional anatomy of the scaphoid. To avoid long-te rm plaster immobilization and to diminish the risk of a non union, unstable fractures of type B should be fixed operatively. With headless screws such as the Herbert screw, which are now available in a cannulated shape, the majority of scaphoid fractures of type B1 and B2 ca n be stablized using minimally invasive procedures. Severely displaced frac tures require the classical open palmar approach. Proximal pole fractures ( B3) are best managed from the dorsal approach, using the Mini-Herbert screw . Stable fractures of type A2can be treated conservatively in a below-elbow cast or, alternatively, stabilized percutaneously, which allows early mobi lization.