Social polarisation and socioeconomic segregation in a welfare state: The case of Oslo

This paper looks at the competing theses of polarising convergence and poli cy-related divergence in the study of socioeconomic segregation. Using data from Oslo, Norway, it is shown that the level of segregation has remained fairly stable, or has even declined, in spite of increasing income inequali ty. This spatial stabilisation is causally related to a more flexible desig n in city planning and policy. It is, however, not a development in accorda nce with the welfare state approach proposed by Chris Hamnett and some othe r scholars. Rather, we observe a 'perverse' effect where social democracy h as been helped by opposition policies. In consequence, the paper suggests t he use of models of action and the identification of 'closed' and 'open' pr ocesses of change.