The convergence of ecology, conservation biology, and wildlife biology: necessary or redundant?

Citation
Jw. Thomas et Dh. Pletscher, The convergence of ecology, conservation biology, and wildlife biology: necessary or redundant?, WILDL SOC B, 28(3), 2000, pp. 546-549
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
ISSN journal
00917648 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
546 - 549
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-7648(200023)28:3<546:TCOECB>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Since the inception of the "new" field of conservation biology in the mid-1 980s, there has been a long-standing discussion about the differences betwe en conservation biology and the disciplines of wildlife biology and ecology . Events related to management for biodiversity and sustainability have mad e synthesis ne rigueur across disciplinary lines. The developing concept of ecosystem management and preservation of biodiversity has produced a conve rgence of biological fields, at least where synthesis is essential to task accomplishment. However, all of these fields, individually and collectively , fall short of their potential in terms of relating to social and economic factors.