Recent molecular studies of amniote relationships show turtles to be diapsi
d reptiles, related to the archosauromorph branch of saurian phylogeny. Thi
s conflicts with palaeontological data which shows turtles to be related ei
ther to anapsids, or to the lepidosauromorph branch within diapsids. Archos
auromorph relationships of turtles have previously been proposed on the bas
is of neontological (mostly soft anatomy) characters. This paper reviews th
e neontological character evidence for turtle relationships and shows that
most, but not all, of these characters are invalid in the reconstruction of
turtle relationships within Amniota.