Jr. Scott et al., SUBTOTAL HYSTERECTOMY IN MODERN GYNECOLOGY - A DECISION-ANALYSIS, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 176(6), 1997, pp. 1186-1191
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the risks and benefits of subtot
al (supracervical) hysterectomy with those of total hysterectomy in wo
men at low risk for cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analysis
was performed. Baseline probabilities for operative and postoperative
morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life were established
for subtotal and total hysterectomy. RESULTS: Operative complication r
ates and ranges for total abdominal hysterectomy were infection 3.0% (
3.0% to 20.0%), hemorrhage 2.0% (2.0% to 15.4%), and adjacent organ in
jury 1.0% (0.7% to 2.0%). Those for subtotal hysterectomy were infecti
on 1.4% (1.0% to 5.0%), hemorrhage 2.0% (0.7% to 4.0%), and adjacent o
rgan injury 0.7% (0.6% to 1.0%). Operative mortality, the risk for dev
elopment of cervicovaginal cancer, and long-term adverse effects on se
xual or vesicourethral function were low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS:
Recently proposed benefits from subtotal hysterectomy are not well pro
ven. Total hysterectomy remains the procedure of choice for most women
.