Is anti-h-caldesmon useful for distinguishing smooth muscle and myofibroblastic tumors? An immunohistochemical study

Citation
Km. Ceballos et al., Is anti-h-caldesmon useful for distinguishing smooth muscle and myofibroblastic tumors? An immunohistochemical study, AM J CLIN P, 114(5), 2000, pp. 746-753
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Volume
114
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
746 - 753
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Misinterpretation of positive staining of antibodies to desmin, smooth musc le actin, and muscle actin as representing smooth muscle differentiation in the context of a spindle cell tumor is not uncommon. Anti-h-caldesmon is a promising novel immunohistochemical reagent for more specific smooth muscl e differentiation. We studied 72 tumors (II leiomyosarcomas, 26 malignant f ibrous histiocytomas [MFHs], 11 fibromatoses, 11 cellular cutaneous fibrous histiocytomas [CCFHs], 5 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, 4 synov ial sarcomas, and 4 cases of nodular fasciitis), the reactive myofibroblast ic response in 5 cases of acute cholecystitis, and the desmoplastic respons e surrounding 5 invasive breast carcinomas. Tissues were examined for expre ssion of h-caldesmon, desmin, smooth muscle actin, and muscle actin. Diffus e staining for h-caldesmon was present only within the leiomyosarcomas. Foc al staining for h-caldesmon involving less than 1% of lesional cells was pr esent in 3 of 26 MFHs and 1 of 1 CCFHs. There was overlap in staining for t he other "myoid" markers in all of the lesions that contained myofibroblast s. Anti-h-caldesmon seems to be a reliable marker of smooth muscle differen tiation, and its inclusion in a panel of myoid immunohistochemical reagents should allow distinction of smooth muscle and myofibroblastic tumors.