Rj. Jennett et Tj. Tarby, BRACHIAL-PLEXUS PALSY - AN OLD PROBLEM REVISITED AGAIN .2. CASES IN POINT, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 176(6), 1997, pp. 1354-1356
OBJECTIVES: In spite of mounting evidence to the contrary, plaintiffs'
expert witnesses continue to maintain that brachial plexus impairment
is almost always the result of excessive lateral traction on the head
during the last phase of delivery. Case studies are presented to chal
lenge this concept. STUDY DESIGN: Examples encountered in medicolegal
consultations were analyzed with this purpose as our focus. RESULTS: C
ases of brachial plexus impairment were encountered in which there was
no evidence of shoulder dystocia or extreme lateral traction on the f
etal head. In one in which shoulder dystocia was recorded, there was a
lso incontrovertible evidence of intrauterine maladaptation. In anothe
r, the posterior shoulder was involved. CONCLUSION: To propose that sh
oulder dystocia with extreme lateral traction on the fetal head after
its delivery is not a factor in some cases of brachial plexus impairme
nt would be insupportable. Conversely, to maintain a posteriori that b
rachial plexus impairment in itself is evidence that such pressure mus
t have been used is untenable.