There are few suitable techniques available to sterilize biodegradable poly
ester three-dimensional tissue engineering scaffolds because they are susce
ptible to degradation and/or morphological degeneration by high temperature
and pressure. We used a novel poly(lactide-co-glycolide) scaffold (Osteofo
am(TM)) to determine the optimal sterilization procedure - i.e. a sterile p
roduct with minimal degradation and deformation. Initial studies, found tha
t an argon plasma created at 100W for 4 min was optimal for sterilizing Ost
eofoam(TM) scaffolds without affecting their morphology. The RFGD plasma st
erilization method was compared to two well-established techniques - ethyle
ne oxide (ETO) and gamma -irradiation (gamma) - which were in turn compared
to disinfection in 70% ethanol. Disinfection in 70% ethanol serves as a us
eful control because it affects neither the morphology nor the molecular we
ight of the polymer; yet, ethanol is unsuitable as a sterilization method b
ecause it does not adequately eliminate hydrophilic viruses and bacterial s
pores. The three sterilization techniques, ETO, gamma and RFGD plasma, were
compared in terms of their immediate and long-term effects on the dimensio
ns, morphology, molecular weight and degradation profile of the scaffolds.
Scaffolds shrank to similar to 60% of their initial volume after ETO steril
ization whereas their molecular weight (Mw) decreased by similar to 50% aft
er gamma -irradiation. Thus, both ETO and gamma -irradiation posed immediat
e problems as sterilization techniques for 3-D biodegradable polyester scaf
folds. During the in vitro degradation study, all sterilized samples showed
advanced morphological and volume changes over time relative to ethanol (E
tOH) disinfected samples, with the greatest changes observed for gamma -irr
adiated samples. ETO, RFGD plasma sterilized and EtOH disinfected samples s
howed similar changes in Mw and mass over the 8-week time frame. Overall, o
f the three sterilization techniques studied, RFGD plasma was the best. (C)
2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.